A study of preferred information processing style and its relationship to gender and achievement in the context of design and technology project work
Abstract
One way of raising the efficiency of a scholar’s learning and achievement is to improve teaching strategies employed by staff and the learning strategies adopted by the learner. Teachers have long recognised that learners
differ in how they learn and interact with the teaching materials provided for them. However, as Riding (2002) explained, teachers have often lacked a clear means of knowing what these differences were and thereby take account of such differences in their teaching. The research reported in this article attempts to illustrate two of these differences: namely preferred information processing style and gender, and their relationship to achievement in the context of design and technology project work across two phases of education. A smallscale
study involving three separate cohorts was used for data collection purposes. Cohort A was made up of 54 students from a university in the North East of England. These students were studying to become secondary
school teachers of design and technology. Cohort B was made up of 63 students from a university in the Midlands. In this instance these students were studying to become industrial product designers. Cohort C was made up of 50 Year 10 pupils. These pupils were studying for their GCSE design and technology examination. Data concerning,
preferred information processing style, gender and achievement were analysed and the relationship between the selected variables was discussed. Conclusions pertinent to this study were then drawn in the hope that
teaching and learning strategies could be improved and that teachers in other institutions may be able to extrapolate from the findings to suit their own situations.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.